History: Class 12 (Book 1) — Chapter 3: Kinship, Caste and Class: Early Societies (c. 600 BCE - 600 CE)

Kinship, Caste and Class: Early Societies (c. 600 BCE - 600 CE)
1. The Critical Edition of the Mahabharata
  • The Project Initiation (1919): Launched under the leadership of noted Indian Sanskritist V.S. Sukthankar to prepare a critical edition of the Mahabharata .
  • Methodology & Scale: Collected Sanskrit manuscripts written in various scripts from across the subcontinent. Compared verses from each manuscript, selecting those common to most versions. Published in several volumes running into over 13,000 pages; took 47 years to complete.
  • Key Revelations:
    • Subcontinental Consensus: Deep-seated common elements in Sanskrit versions found from Kashmir and Nepal in the north to Kerala and Tamil Nadu in the south.
    • Regional Variations: Enormous regional variations in textual transmission over centuries, documented in footnotes and appendices comprising more than half of the 13,000 pages.
  • Historiographical Shift: Early 19th-20th century historians took Sanskrit texts written by and for Brahmanas at face value. Subsequent studies of Pali, Prakrit, and Tamil traditions revealed that while Brahmanical norms were authoritative, they were frequently questioned, negotiated, and occasionally rejected.
2. Kinship and Marriage: Rules and Varied Practices
  • Socio-Terminology of Kinship:
    • kula : Sanskrit term designating families.
    • jnati : Sanskrit term for the larger network of kinfolk.
    • vamsha : Sanskrit term designating lineage.
  • The Ideal of Patriliny:
    • Patriliny : Tracing descent from father to son, grandson, and so on.
    • Matriliny : Tracing descent through the mother.
    • Epic Reinforcement: The central story of the Mahabharata describes a feud over land and power between two groups of cousins, the Kauravas and the Pandavas (belonging to the Kurus lineage). The Pandavas' victory reinforced patrilineal succession as a valuable ideal.
    • Variations in Practice: While most ruling dynasties (c. 6th century BCE onwards) claimed patriliny, variations existed: succession by brothers, other kinsmen, or exceptionally by women such as Prabhavati Gupta .
  • Rules of Marriage & Alliances:
    • Daughters' Status: Had no claims to household resources; marrying them outside the kin group was considered desirable ( exogamy ).
    • Kanyadana : The gift of a daughter in marriage, regarded as an important religious duty of the father.
    • Brahmanical Codification: Emergence of new towns led to complex social interactions and questioning of older beliefs. Brahmanas responded by laying down detailed codes of social behaviour in Dharmasutras and Dharmashastras (c. 500 BCE onwards). The most important work, the Manusmriti , was compiled between c. 200 BCE and 200 CE.

"I free her from here, but not from there. I have bound her firmly there, so that through the grace of Indra she will have fine sons and be fortunate in her husband’s love."


Analytical Historical Context & Interpretation: This mantra from the Rigveda (inserted c. 1000 BCE) is chanted during marriage rituals. It highlights the transition of the bride from her father's house ("here") to her husband's house ("there"), reinforcing patriliny and the religious focus on producing male heirs under the patronage of the deity Indra .

Comparative Matrix of Marriage Types
Marriage Type Structural Definition Brahmanical Status / Acceptance
Endogamy Marriage within a specific unit (kin group, caste, or local group). Practised widely in southern India; ran counter to northern exogamous ideals.
Exogamy Marriage outside the specific unit (kin group or gotra). Highly recommended and regulated in Brahmanical texts for high-status groups.
Polygyny The practice of a man having several wives. Common among ruling elites (e.g., Satavahanas) and wealthy classes.
Polyandry The practice of a woman having several husbands. Unusual/condemned in standard texts, but central to Draupadi's marriage in the epic; prevalent in Himalayan regions.
The Gotra System & Satavahana Deviations
  • Gotra Rules (c. 1000 BCE onwards): People classified into gotras named after Vedic seers. Two key rules:
    1. Women must adopt their husband's gotra and give up their father's upon marriage.
    2. Members of the same gotra cannot marry (exogamy).
  • The Satavahana Case Study (c. 2nd century BCE - 2nd century CE):
    • Metronymics: Satavahana rulers were identified through names derived from their mothers (e.g., Gotami-puta , meaning "son of Gotami").
    • Gotra Retention: Inscriptions show Satavahana queens retained their fathers' gotras (like Gotama and Vasistha) instead of adopting their husbands'.
    • Endogamy: Many queens belonged to the same gotra, indicating endogamous cousin-marriage alliances common in South India, directly violating Brahmanical exogamy.
    • Patrilineal Succession: Despite metronymic naming, succession to the Satavahana throne remained strictly patrilineal.
3. Social Differences: Within and Beyond the Framework of Caste
  • The Varna Hierarchy: A divinely ordained, birth-determined social order laid down in the Dharmasutras and Dharmashastras .
The Four Varnas and Prescribed Occupations
Varna Prescribed Occupations & Duties Brahmanical Enforcement Strategies
Brahmanas Study and teach the Vedas, perform and get sacrifices performed, give and receive gifts. Asserted divine origin via the Purusha sukta (Rigveda); advised kings to enforce varna norms; persuaded people status was birth-determined.
Kshatriyas Engage in warfare, protect people, administer justice, study the Vedas, get sacrifices performed, make gifts. Reinforced through epic narratives and royal patronage.
Vaishyas Study the Vedas, get sacrifices performed, make gifts, engage in agriculture, pastoralism, and trade. Integrated into the economic backbone of the state.
Shudras Servitude to the three higher varnas. Only one occupation assigned. Placed at the bottom of the social hierarchy, excluded from ritual privileges.
Non-Kshatriya Kings & Social Mobility
  • The Shastric Rule: Only Kshatriyas were permitted to be kings. However, historical evidence reveals diverse origins of ruling dynasties:
    • Mauryas: Brahmanical texts describe them as of "low" origin, whereas Buddhist texts claim they were Kshatriyas.
    • Shungas and Kanvas: Immediate successors to the Mauryas, who were actually Brahmanas .
    • Shakas (Central Asia): Regarded as mlechchhas (barbarians/outsiders) by Brahmanas, yet rulers like Rudradaman (c. 2nd century CE) rebuilt the Sudarshana lake and patronized Sanskrit.
    • Satavahanas: Gotami-puta Siri-Satakani claimed to be a unique Brahmana ( eka bamhana ) and destroyer of Kshatriya pride, while simultaneously entering marriage alliances with the mlechchha Shakas.
  • Jatis and Guilds ( shrenis ):
    • Jati : Birth-based social categories. Unlike the fixed four varnas, there was no limit on the number of jatis.
    • Integration of Outsiders: New occupational groups or communities that did not fit the varna system (e.g., forest-dwelling nishadas , goldsmiths or suvarnakaras ) were classified as jatis.
    • The Mandasor Inscription (c. 5th century CE): Records the migration of a guild ( shreni ) of silk weavers from Lata (Gujarat) to Dashapura (Mandasor, MP). It reveals that guild members adopted diverse occupations (astronomy, music, military service) and collectively funded a temple to the sun god.
Beyond the Varnas: Exclusion, Subordination, and Conflict
  • The Concept of Pollution: Brahmanas classified certain activities—especially handling corpses and dead animals—as polluting. Those who performed these tasks were designated as chandalas and placed at the absolute bottom of the social hierarchy.
  • Duties of Chandalas (according to the Manusmriti ):
    • Must live outside the village boundaries.
    • Use discarded utensils, wear clothes of the dead, and ornaments of iron.
    • Forbidden from walking in villages and cities at night.
    • Required to dispose of unclaimed bodies and serve as executioners.
  • Observations of Chinese Pilgrims:
    • Fa Xian (c. 5th century CE): Noted that "untouchables" had to strike a clapper in the streets so others could avoid looking at them.
    • Xuan Zang (c. 7th century CE): Observed that executioners and scavengers were forced to live outside the city walls.
4. Beyond Birth: Resources and Status
  • Gendered Access to Property:
    • The Epic Precedent: In the Mahabharata , Yudhisthira stakes and loses his wealth, kingdom, brothers, himself, and finally their common wife Draupadi in a game of dice, highlighting women's vulnerability as property.
    • Manusmriti Rules: Paternal estate was to be divided equally among sons after the parents' death, with a special share for the eldest. Women could not claim a share of the family estate.
    • Stridhana : "Woman's wealth"—gifts received by a woman at the time of her marriage. She retained control over this, and it could be inherited by her children without her husband having a claim. However, women were warned against hoarding family property without permission.
  • Varna and Access to Wealth:
    • Brahmanical texts linked wealth directly to varna, with Brahmanas and Kshatriyas prescribed as the wealthiest.
    • Buddhist Critique: Early Buddhism (c. 6th century BCE onwards) rejected birth-based status. Texts like the Majjhima Nikaya (in the dialogue between King Avantiputta and Kachchana) argued that wealth transcended varna: a wealthy Shudra would have Brahmanas, Kshatriyas, and Vaishyas serving him, proving all varnas were functionally equal.
  • Alternative Social Scenario: Sharing Wealth in Tamilakam:
    • In ancient Tamilakam (c. 2,000 years ago), social values differed: generous chiefs who shared their resources were highly respected, while miserly accumulators of wealth were despised.
    • Sangam Literature: Anthologies like the Puranaruru contain poems by bards praising generous chiefs who patronized them, even if the chiefs themselves were poor.
5. Explaining Social Differences: A Social Contract
  • The Buddhist Social Contract Theory:
    • Found in the Buddhist Pali \text, the Sutta Pitaka .
    • The Myth: Originally, humans lived in an idyllic state of peace, taking only what they needed for each meal. Over time, humanity became greedy, deceitful, and vindictive.
    • The Contract: To prevent chaos, humans decided to select a leader who would maintain order, punish the wrongdoers, and banish the undesirable. In return, the people promised to give him a proportion of their rice harvest.
    • The Mahasammata : The chosen leader, meaning "the great elect." This theory \implies that kingship was a human institution based on choice and consent, with taxes serving as payment for services rendered, rejecting the divine origin of kingship.
6. Handling Texts: Historians and the Mahabharata
  • Analytical Framework for Historians:
    • Language: Sanskrit (used by elites/priests) vs. Prakrit, Pali, or Tamil (used by ordinary people).
    • Genre: Mantras (chanted by specialists) vs. stories (circulated, retold, and read).
    • Authorship & Audience: Identifying the perspectives, dates, and locations of composition.
  • Language and Content of the Mahabharata:
    • The Sanskrit used in the epic is simpler than that of the Vedas or royal prashastis , making it widely accessible.
    • Classification of Content:
      • Narrative: Sections containing stories and dramatic plots.
      • Didactic: Sections containing social prescriptions and moral instructions (e.g., the Bhagavad Gita ).
  • Authorship and Evolution:
    • Charioteer-Bards ( sutas ): Originally composed the core story, accompanying Kshatriya warriors to battlefields and orally reciting their victories.
    • Brahmanical Writing (c. 5th century BCE onwards): Brahmanas took over the oral tradition and committed it to writing during the rise of Kuru-Panchala kingdoms.
    • Vaishnava Influence (c. 200 BCE - 200 CE): Period of growing Vishnu worship; Krishna emerged as a central figure identified with Vishnu.
    • Didactic Additions (c. 200 - 400 CE): Large didactic sections resembling the Manusmriti were added. The \text expanded from under 10,000 verses to over 100,000 verses, traditionally attributed to the sage Vyasa .
  • Archaeological Search for Convergence:
    • In 1951-52, archaeologist B.B. Lal excavated the village of Hastinapura (Meerut, Uttar Pradesh).
    • Excavation Findings:
      • Second Phase (c. 12th - 7th centuries BCE): Houses built of mud and mud-bricks; walls of reed plastered over with mud.
      • Third Phase (c. 6th - 3rd centuries BCE): Houses made of mud-brick and burnt bricks; use of soakage jars, brick drains, and terracotta ring-wells.
7. Chronological Timelines
Timeline 1: Major Textual Traditions
Approximate Date Textual Tradition / Development
c. 500 BCE Ashtadhyayi of Panini (Sanskrit grammar)
c. 500 - 200 BCE Major Dharmasutras (in Sanskrit)
c. 500 - 100 BCE Early Buddhist texts, including the Tripitaka (in Pali)
c. 500 BCE - 400 CE Ramayana and Mahabharata (in Sanskrit)
c. 200 BCE - 200 CE Manusmriti (in Sanskrit); composition and compilation of Tamil Sangam literature
c. 100 CE Charaka and Sushruta Samhitas (Sanskrit medical treatises)
c. 200 CE onwards Compilation of the Puranas (in Sanskrit)
c. 300 CE Natyashastra of Bharata (dramaturgy in Sanskrit)
c. 300 - 600 CE Other Dharmashastras (in Sanskrit)
c. 400 - 500 CE Sanskrit plays including works of Kalidasa; works on astronomy/mathematics by Aryabhata and Varahamihira; compilation of Jaina works (in Prakrit)
Timeline 2: Landmarks in the Study of the Mahabharata
Year / Period Scholarly Milestone
1919 - 1966 Preparation and publication of the Critical Edition of the Mahabharata under V.S. Sukthankar.
1973 J.A.B. van Buitenen begins the English translation of the Critical Edition (remained incomplete after his death in 1978).