Psychology: Class 12 — Chapter 6: Attitude and Social Cognition

Introduction & Explaining Social Behaviour

Social psychology is the branch of psychology that investigates how the behaviour of individuals is affected by others and the social environment. Social behaviour is a crucial part of human life, extending beyond mere physical presence to include imagined or implied presence of others.

To understand human interaction, social psychologists study both social-cognitive processes and social behaviour, moving beyond common sense to explain how people observe, interpret, and make sense of their own and others' actions.

Nature and Components of Attitudes

The A-B-C Components of Attitude

An attitude is a state of mind, a set of views, or thoughts regarding a specific topic (the 'attitude object') that possesses an evaluative feature (positive, negative, or neutral). It consists of three core components:

  • Affective Aspect (A): The emotional component (e.g., feeling happy or angry about the attitude object).
  • Behavioural Aspect (B): The tendency to act or behave in a particular way toward the attitude object.
  • Cognitive Aspect (C): The thought or belief component regarding the attitude object.

These are collectively known as the A-B-C components of attitude. While they are generally consistent, discrepancies can exist where thoughts do not align with emotions or actions.

Attitudes, Beliefs, and Values

ConceptDefinitionCharacteristics
AttitudesEvaluative states of mind with emotional and action tendencies.Subject to change; direct behaviour.
BeliefsThe cognitive ground on which attitudes stand.Represent subjective truths (e.g., belief in God).
ValuesAttitudes or beliefs containing a moral 'should' or 'ought' aspect.Highly central, stable, and difficult to change.

Properties of Attitudes

Attitudes possess four significant features that determine their influence and stability:

  • Valence: Indicates whether the attitude is positive, negative, or neutral.
  • Extremeness: Reflects how strongly positive or negative an attitude is.
  • Simplicity or Complexity: Refers to the number of member attitudes within a broader attitude system. A system is simple if it has few attitudes, and complex if it contains many.
  • Centrality: The role and influence of a specific attitude within the wider attitude system; central attitudes heavily influence peripheral ones.
Attitude Formation and Change

Process of Attitude Formation

Attitudes are primarily learned through social interaction and personal experiences. The key learning processes include:

  • Learning by association: Developing an attitude by linking a target with a positive or negative stimulus (e.g., liking a subject due to a liked teacher).
  • Learning by being rewarded or punished: Developing positive attitudes toward praised behaviours and negative attitudes toward punished ones.
  • Learning through modelling: Observing others being rewarded or punished for their actions and imitating them.
  • Learning through group or cultural norms: Internalizing unwritten societal rules and expectations over time.
  • Learning through exposure to information: Acquiring attitudes via media, books, and digital platforms.

Factors Influencing Attitude Formation

  1. Family and School Environment: Crucial during early development through direct reinforcement and observational learning.
  2. Reference Groups: Groups that establish acceptable norms of thinking and behaving, especially influential during adolescence.
  3. Personal Experiences: Direct, impactful life events that can drastically alter one's outlook.
  4. Media-related Influences: Audio-visual media and the internet that shape cognitive and affective components of attitudes.

Theories of Attitude Change

Attitude change occurs through distinct cognitive and social processes, explained by three major concepts:

  • Heider's Balance Theory: Proposed by Fritz Heider, this uses the P-O-X triangle (Person, Other, Topic/Object) to show that cognitive imbalance is uncomfortable, driving attitude change toward a balanced state.
  • Festinger's Cognitive Dissonance: Proposed by Leon Festinger, this emphasizes cognitive consistency. When two cognitions are dissonant, mental discomfort drives a change in one of the cognitions to achieve consonance.
  • Mohsin's Two-Step Concept: Proposed by S.M. Mohsin, this states that attitude change occurs in two steps: first, the target identifies with the source; second, the source changes their own behaviour, prompting the target to imitate and change.

Case/Experiment Title: Telling a Lie for Twenty Dollars

Background/Subject: A group of students who participated in a highly boring experimental task.

Method/Procedure: Participants were asked to lie to waiting students, telling them the task was interesting. Half the participants were paid $1 for the lie, while the other half were paid $20. Later, all participants rated the actual interest level of the task.

Observations/Results: The $1 group rated the boring task as significantly more interesting than the $20 group. The $1 group experienced high cognitive dissonance because $1 was insufficient justification for lying, forcing them to change their attitude to align with their behaviour. The $20 group had sufficient external justification and felt no dissonance.

Psychological Inference: When external rewards are low, individuals experience greater cognitive dissonance, leading to internal attitude change to restore consistency.

Factors Influencing Attitude Change

  • Existing Attitude Characteristics: Positive, simple, and peripheral attitudes are easier to change than negative, complex, and central ones. Change can be congruent (moving further in the same direction) or incongruent (moving in the opposite direction).
  • Source Characteristics: Source credibility and attractiveness increase the likelihood of attitude change.
  • Message Characteristics: The amount of information, rational vs. emotional appeals, and the motives activated by the message influence persuasiveness.
  • Target Characteristics: Qualities like persuasibility, self-esteem, intelligence, and existing prejudices determine how easily a target's attitude can be modified.
Attitude-Behaviour Relationship

Consistency Conditions

Attitudes do not always predict actual behaviour. Consistency is highest when:

  • The attitude is strong and central.
  • The person is highly aware of their attitude.
  • There is minimal external or group pressure.
  • The behaviour is not being actively evaluated by others.
  • The person anticipates positive consequences from the behaviour.

Case/Experiment Title: LaPiere's Attitude-Behaviour Consistency Study

Background/Subject: An American social psychologist, Richard LaPiere, and a Chinese couple travelling across the United States during a period of high anti-Chinese prejudice.

Method/Procedure: LaPiere accompanied the Chinese couple to various hotels and restaurants. Later, he sent questionnaires to the same establishments asking if they would accommodate Chinese guests.

Observations/Results: The couple was refused service only once in person. However, when surveyed later via questionnaire, a vast majority of the establishments stated they would refuse accommodation to Chinese guests.

Psychological Inference: Expressed attitudes (questionnaire responses) can differ drastically from actual behaviour (in-person accommodation), demonstrating that attitudes are not perfect predictors of actions.

Prejudice and Discrimination

Definitions and Differences

Prejudices are typically negative attitudes directed toward a specific group, often based on stereotypes (overgeneralized, cognitive beliefs about the group's characteristics). When prejudice translates into negative actions, it becomes discrimination (the behavioural component).

Sources of Prejudice

  • Learning: Prejudices are acquired through association, reinforcement, modelling, and exposure to biased information.
  • Strong Social Identity & Ingroup Bias: Elevating one's own group by devaluing outgroups.
  • Scapegoating: Blaming a minority outgroup for societal, economic, or political frustrations.
  • Kernel of Truth: Maintaining stereotypes by focusing on isolated examples that seem to support them.
  • Self-fulfilling Prophecy: Behaving in ways that provoke the target group to act in a manner that seemingly justifies the original prejudice.

Strategies for Handling Prejudice

Prejudice can be mitigated through targeted interventions:

  1. Education and Information Dissemination: Correcting stereotypes and reducing ingroup bias.
  2. Increasing Intergroup Contact: Encouraging direct communication under cooperative, equal-status conditions.
  3. Highlighting Individual Identity: Evaluating people based on personal characteristics rather than group membership.