A group is defined as an organised system of two or more individuals, who are interacting and interdependent, who have common motives, have a set of role relationships among its members, and have norms that regulate the behaviour of its members.
Groups are distinguished from other collections of people such as crowds, teams, and audiences:
| Feature | Groups | Teams |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Dependency | Dependent on individual contributions of members. | Both individual contributions and teamwork matter. |
| Responsibility | The leader or head holds responsibility for the work. | Members hold themselves individually and mutually responsible. |
People join groups to satisfy a variety of psychological and social needs:
Group formation is facilitated by several key conditions:
According to Tuckman, groups pass through five developmental stages:
Over time, regularities in interactions shape the group structure, which consists of four main elements:
Extreme cohesiveness can lead to Groupthink, a phenomenon conceptualised by Irving Janis. It occurs when a highly cohesive group overrides realistic appraisal of alternative courses of action to maintain unanimity.
Case/Experiment Title: The Vietnam War Escalation Decision
Background/Subject: President Lyndon Johnson and his advisors (1964β1967).
Method/Procedure: Analysis of policy decisions to escalate the Vietnam War despite clear warnings and alternative viewpoints.
Observations/Results: The group ignored warning signs, suppressed dissenting opinions to maintain harmony, and overestimated their own power, leading to a major political and humanitarian fiasco.
Psychological Inference: Groupthink leads to irrational, uncritical decision-making, ignoring external realities to preserve internal cohesion.
Ways to prevent Groupthink include encouraging critical thinking, inviting outside experts, and presenting alternative courses of action.
Groups can be classified into three major categories:
Case/Experiment Title: The Minimal Group Paradigm Experiments
Background/Subject: British schoolboys studied by Henri Tajfel and colleagues.
Method/Procedure: Boys were categorized into "Kandinsky group" or "Klee group" based on a flimsy preference for paintings. They were then asked to distribute money to others identified only by code numbers and group membership.
Observations/Results: Despite having no past history or future interaction, the boys consistently favoured members of their own group (ingroup) over the outgroup.
Psychological Inference: Categorisation itself is sufficient to trigger ingroup favouritism and outgroup discrimination.
While Social Facilitation refers to enhanced performance in the presence of others, Social Loafing is the reduction in individual effort when working on a collective task where individual outputs are pooled.
Case/Experiment Title: Noise Production in Groups (LatanΓ© et al.)
Background/Subject: Groups of male students.
Method/Procedure: Subjects were asked to clap or cheer as loudly as possible, either alone or in groups of two, four, and six.
Observations/Results: Although the total noise increased with group size, the individual noise output per participant dropped significantly as the group size increased.
Psychological Inference: Individuals exert less effort when their individual contribution cannot be identified or evaluated.
Social loafing occurs because of diffused responsibility, decreased motivation, lack of group comparison, or poor coordination. It can be reduced by making individual efforts identifiable, increasing task importance, and strengthening group cohesiveness.
Group Polarisation is the tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclination of its individual members.
Group polarisation occurs due to three main reasons: